The above 4-way split screen image says a lot about this evidence. Of what portion we can see of it, this object looks incredibly very much like an anatomically correct humanoid skull or perhaps a humanoid statue head sticking out of the ground staring sightlessly upward from its dark empty eye sockets and its general position suggests an unseen body laying on its back under the ground. Note the anatomically general size and shape, the forehead, the empty socket dark eye holes, the bone bridge between the eye holes, the nose projection, and the beginnings of one side of the mouth. Information just not to be ignored.

However, for me, what makes this even more reportable as anomalous evidence even more than its general look is the fluffy image tampering applications clustered around the base of the object. This darker bulky obscuring area isn't rocks and/or shadow as one might at first presume, it is image tampering giving it this false bulky look in those spots. To be able to see this image tampering texture better is why I've included the lower right fourth split screen lightened image. Note the diffuse fluffy fuzzy quality that are these darker tampering areas. This is typical of false artificially added information as compared to real solid particulate surfaces like the real ground level bone (skull) or artificially worked statue head material that are of course as hard surfaces much more solar light reflective. For me, it is these image tampering applications partially obscuring this object that gives much more credence to this being something someone did not want us to be able to adequately recognize.

So why not just hide the whole thing? I suspect that is often the case with the most critical geometric and linear shaped evidence so suggestive of artificiality ultitudes of perfectly normal natural geology have also been needlessly hidden because it may have demonstrated a little too much geometric or linear geometry suggestive of artificiality that the imperfect software is programmed to recognize and not like.

However, more irregular shaped objects and angles are another matter and it is apparently not so easy for the automatic tampering software's programming to recognize this kind of material as objectionable and a possible candidate for its tampering applications. For example, there is my Report #073 titled "Animal Fossil Skulls on Mwhere all is hidden under obliterating applications. I suspect great multitudes of anomalous and very real visual information has been successfully hidden in this way and we may never know how much. Likewise, I suspect that great mars" where the animal fossil skull evidence has no tampering on it at all. The tampering software clearly doesn't see such animal evidence as different than other normal rocks in the terrain. On the other hand, what may be true of animal fossil evidence and what may be true of humanoid skull evidence could be two very different matters.

Still, if that's true, why the only partial tampering applications here? I suspect the answer to that may be in the location of exactly where the tampering concentrates on this particular object and that is not on its most recognizable humanoid features. I suspect that this being or statue representation of a being included a suit of some kind with objects on either side of the neck at the lapel areas. To the tampering software and its much closer much more detailed than admitted to imaging, either these objects had recognizable geometric forms or lines or the suit's stand up lapels had organized geometric forms on them and this was the target of the automated image tampering rather than the head area itself. Partially obscuring the head may have just been a secondary factor.

Also, once a tampering application is applied, it is typical for the software to string and dribble additional applications in varying degrees and densities at random out to the side of the original application. The purpose of this is to make the original target site applications less concentrated and uniform looking, more irregular looking, and therefore less obvious.

Meanwhile when anomalous evidence of life like this is found, further research is normally done around in the other rover cameras on the same Spirit Sol 513 to see if any better visual evidence can be found. In this case, there wasn't much of anything on the skull evidence but there was some different evidence that I thought you might be interested in seeing as appears in the next images below. Remember, this is at the same Sol 513 Spirit rover location but now from the navigation camera view pointed in a different direction and out in the distance. Normally I would not report on this kind of more obscure evidence either but here I think you may find it informative.

For More on This Article Visit J.P. Skipper here